Analysis Of Why Congress Should Legalize Pot By Jeffery Miron

In the article, â€Å"Why Congress Should Legalize Pot† by Jeffery Miron, he lists many different reasons why he thinks marijuana should be legalized by the federal government for recreational use in the United States. Throughout the article Miron uses a consistent amount of logos in an effort to persuade or convince the readers that his opinion is correct. By continuously listing facts and logical statements supporting federal legalization he hopes that the reader will understand and be able to eventually agree with his opinion. Miron uses a very minimal yet effective amount of pathos towards the end of his article. He talks about how marijuana can help with various medical issues including the chemotherapy process of cancer. This appeals†¦show more content†¦Shortly after, Miron starts reffering to and talking about the state of Colorado, which in 2012 became the first state to legalize recreational use of marijuana. Miron states, â€Å"Since commercialization of m edical marijuana in 2009, and since legalization in 2012, marijuana use, crime, traffic accidents, education and health outcomes have all followed their pre-existing trends rather than increasing or decreasing after policy liberalized† (Miron 1). Expressing this fact in his article is very crucial to Miron’s argument, because one of the big issues some people fear when talking about legalizing marijuana is that things like crime and traffic accidents will increase, but this fact proves them wrong. Shortly following this point he changes his perspective a little, in an attempt to further prove his argument. Miron quickly moves to talking about legalization from a more personal standpoint, while still using mostly logos in his arguments. He starts talking about how one of the biggest pros that Colorado has seen after legalization is that people simply have easier access to the drug. Miron was very smart to put this in his article, because this is something people have bee n striving for, especially medical users that need marijuana to keep living comfortably that now don’t have to worry about using or buying it illegally. Not too long

The Societies Of The World - 1133 Words

Orientalism that view the societies of the world in a dualistic manner—the West sees and defines itself in relation to a culture of opposites. While it identifies itself as familiar and normal, it characterizes the Other according to its deficiencies. The Western world will never be able to fully understand other societies and their differences in relation to one another if it continues to perpetuate these distinctions. Wolf’s perspective places an emphasis on the role of history in perceptions of the non-Western world and how the West does not account for the history of these other peoples. By â€Å"people without history,† Wolf means the societies that the West has deemed insignificant and primitive yet continues to exert power over.†¦show more content†¦They see themselves as superior and more advanced—they are the ones that have evolved and subsequently are the producers of history. Another point of Wolf’s argument that agrees with Said’s perspective is that non-Western nations were not isolated and static entities before Western colonialism. Wolf, like Said, challenges the notion that Western intervention into the cultures of these peoples is necessary and without it, these societies would be hopeless and have no part in the global economy. Ultimately, Wolf understands that non-Western societies are just as intertwined into the workings of global processes and that they significantly contribute to history and the global economy. Capitalism has been allowed to emerge as a dominant mode of production, however, Wolf challenges the notion that non-Western cultures and people were isolated and static entities before the advent of European colonialism and imperialism. Before active colonization, these societies possessed changing reactionary cultures and were just as intertwined into the processes of the global economic system as European counterpar ts. The problems that the non-West experiences are a result of the unbalanced power structures developed by the West. The West does not seek to understand, or accept, the broader connections and relationships between cultures, especially between the West and the non-West. Just as Wolf

Rebuttal Argument free essay sample

If a kid say they are bored something needs to be done so that they do not find something to do themselves. Most times kids find things to do themselves not knowing whether something is right or wrong, therefore getting them into trouble. Setting a curfew will keep a kid couped up in the room and decide they wanna try to play a game that is meant for outside. Well the problem with that is that the kid is on the inside. So by them playing in the house they will either hurt themselves on some furniture or break something inside the house if not both. Some parents like to set curfews but they may still be at work. So the kids will try to clock their parents and figure out what time they get home so that they will be home before their parents do. That being said some kids would get into trouble cause their parents might be coming home early. We will write a custom essay sample on Rebuttal Argument or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page So there are any flaws to a curfew, but people do not sit down and figure out what they are. Sneaking out is one of the biggest things with this generation. Kids and teens believe they can out smart their parents, therefore they will try and devise a plan to sneak out of the house. As said by an anonymous user on debate. org â€Å"Curfews wont help because teenagers will find another way, like when I was younger I always had a curfew but I remember always trying to find a way to sneek out so I could hang out with my friends. So in my opinion curfews dont help because teens will just find another way. † There are teens out their who want to voice their opinion and show that a curfew would be completely pointless because there are tactics to get around curfews. My last point is my biggest point and it is about the summer. It is the end of the school year and the kids are ready to wind down and enjoy their summer to the fullest. Although school is out for the summer the curfew that is in effect is set year round. With a curfew during the summer, it will cut kids days short. This just means they can not do as much as they want to do in their day. There are some kids who actually plan out their summer and if some kids do not ge their way they will be upset. A user by the name of Zaradi made a good point on debate. org and this person stated â€Å"For one, curfews only prevent crime or criminal activity during the night. A teenager, presuming that teenager obeyed the curfew, could still get in plenty of trouble during the day. For two, any teenager whos actively looking for trouble or to break the law isnt going to let something as silly as a curfew stop them. If theyre going to break the law, what does it matter if they do it during curfew? Its just another law that they broke. If they dont care about breaking one law, presumably one of more significance than curfew, then what issues would they have of breaking it during curfew? With this statement it just shows that just because you set a curfew does not mean the kids will not find a way to go around the curfew or just blatantly disobey it to the fullest. Overall curefews do not do much. Based on statistics, curfews actually only punish 0. 5% of all teens whereas the other 99. 5% are actually law bidding teens. Also parents believe that 43% of juveniles commit crimes when the true number is actually 13%. One last statistic that I want to point out is that 23% of all cities with curfews report that any aspect of teens breaking curfew has made additional cost for police department.